WHEN WILL family abusers be brought to justice alongside the Professional Abusers (SS, Cafcass, judges, solicitors)?

No Solicitors!!!

This blog post is an excellent summary of the badness of the child snatching situation in the UK:

  • copy of one of the regular articles by Christopher Booker in The Telegraph
  • the covering email contained a comment by one of the mothers involved: “I have written to my MP and the PM and many others but to no avail. Everyone says to come home and then ‘they’ will look at it, but the truth is that I will simply be put in prison for child abduction and the children will go into care. It is just a trap, I’m not stupid. I have long since lost all faith in the British justice system.It has been hard for all of us but we are getting on well. I keep busy so I don’t have to think about what has happened, when I do think about it, it is just all too much to cope with. The hardest thing of all is knowing the injustice of the British Family Court System first hand and knowing that nothing is going to be done.

    When will this change?

    When will family abusers be brought to justice alongside the professional abusers (SS, Cafcass, Judges, Solicitors) that run riot within this draconian system that answers only to themselves and consistently fails so many victims of abuse?

  • a comment by another mother: “The Courts are not there to protect the children and seem to support paedophilia.”
Advertisements

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician, software designer, system analyst, event organiser, independent web publisher and online promoter of positivity.
This entry was posted in #childsnatchbritain, #paedobritain, Abolition of Forced Adoption, Child Sexual Abuse, Family Court Reform, Innocent until proved guilty, Internet media, No Punishment without Crime, Paedophilia, Protest and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to WHEN WILL family abusers be brought to justice alongside the Professional Abusers (SS, Cafcass, judges, solicitors)?

  1. Anonymous says:

    This is a money laundering racket based on people in Authority with criminal interests.

  2. We can identify the rackets we can identify the individuals controlling and taking part in these rackets. We have sufficient evidence to prosecute these people if we had a honest and legal Court system. My letter to PM Will explain why I think “our” legal system has failed and can no longer be trusted to act justly.

    Although this letter was written to support the Petition to return Bailie Kate Cooper to her parent, and does not refer directly to the Senior Judge that defied the International Court Order, it does show that the Courts are not adhering to the law and this manner of judicial “justice” is “justice at the whim of the Judge.
    .
    Dear David Cameron,
    Re the attached Petition our democratic rights.
    Political dissent
    The protection of freedoms that facilitate peaceful dissent has become a hallmark of free and open societies. Let me first make clear that I only write material that I believe is true
    after considering the facts relating directly to the matter. I am not personally involved with forced adoptions, but I have a duty to my conscience to be candid and ask that you consider whether there has been fraud, error, or mistake, and consider the evidence
    presented in this petition and your own sources. You may then accept that the only honest and lawful action open to you is to immediately return Bailie Kate Cooper to her father and lawful guardian.

    The International Court Order has found that the UK government has sanctioned the removal of a child from her family’s place of residence, and taken her across international borders, using false documents, and against International, EU, and UK laws. These felons have been identified as a UK authority, acting under the unlawful protection of the UK judiciary.

    This International Court Judgement has Ordered the immediate return of Bailie Kate Cooper and has imposed the punishment of financial penalties for delay. The Judiciary and authorities have refused or failed to comply with this Order.

    The UK government has betrayed it’s Oath to administer justice according to the law. This is a betrayal of the Oath of office. The failure or refusal of the Judiciary to act according to law is breach of the Oath of Office and loss of the power to administer justice granted by the Crown.

    The British constitution, is based upon the power vested in HM the Queen, to whom The PM, Cabinet Ministers, and Judiciary swear or affirm allegiance before taking office.
    This gives the PM and the authorities power to govern the people according to law, in the name of the people, through the power invested in the Crown. All members of the Army swear (or affirm) allegiance to the Crown, and having served in the British Army I have taken the Oath of allegiance to the Crown.

    A breach by any of the consenting parties of the International Court Order is a matter of State, and you have a duty as PM to keep HM the Queen informed of matters of State and seek her advice. If you had previously understood the removal to have been lawful, the authority of English law was transferred to the International Court. The removal of Bailie Kate Cooper was executed under the UK policy of forced adoptions. The International Court has acted within the law to Order the return of Bailie Kate Cooper this is within the legislation common to all the High contracting parties and would remain consistent with the law for all families in respect the HRA.

    Prime Minister Julia Gillard has issued an apology to people affected by Australia’s forced
    adoption policy between the 1950s and 1970s. Tens of thousands of babies and many times that number of parents and relatives were caused harm from what she called; ”unethical, dishonest, and probably illegal practice”.

    The internet web site; www. telegraph.co.uk. Friday 5th April 2013. News ;- Australia’s scandal of forced adoption is happening here in Britain The forcible removal of children by social workers in Australia between the 1950s and the 1970s.

    The question was put by Florence Bellone to Professor Eileen Munro about whether in the future we may see an apology in the UK. Her response was: “I would not be surprised if a future generation looks back and thinks how horrific the quality of our work was and the damage that we did to families.”

    The Rt Hon John Hemming MP Chairman of Justice for Families Campaign Group has raised Early Day Motions attempting to reduce the number of injustices where families are damaged by false allegations, and have children taken from them by local authority.

    You will be aware that the International Court Order concerning Bailie Kate Cooper, has exposed this unlawful conduct as part of an abusive campaign for forced adoptions. In view of the shock, anger, bitterness, helplessness, loss of respect, and dignity, that festers forever in the mind. This evil practice which has been thoroughly condemned by Julia Gillard , Professor Eileen Munro, and MPs must be ended. As it tortures not just the victims, and families of victims, but the conscience of all right thinking people, and is recognised as one of the most severe personal injuries that can be inflicted on people.

    Politically and humanely you have a “Golden Opportunity” to recognise the problem and make your own “Positive Change”. Decide to act and reverse the massively destructive harm that has been done, and is being done through this corrupt practice, that has been going on for generations.

    I hope that you are able to act with honesty and integrity, and take immediate steps to rectify this matter which is of significant importance to many thousands of families . It is shameful, that some families have felt obliged to leave this country and seek refuge or hide themselves in a foreign country, rather than have their children taken away from them.

    I would be grateful to hear from you in respect of this petition, and I have attached copies of my emails to the Rt Hon Fiona Mctaggart.

    Yours sincerely
    John Love QFSM
    …………………..
    This part did not form any part of the letter but may explain my thought process;

    am not a lawyer but my understanding of what the words in an Oath of allegiance means; is a marriage of loyalty to the Queen as Monarch her heirs and successors and the officers appointed under her. The Oath is a binding contract, and the Contract of the Magna Carta was a signed contract.

    It does not take a signed document to make the Oath it is enough to know that the Office appointed by the Crown must take the Oath. (Otherwise he or she cannot take Office) and it is only HM the Queen and the Officers appointed under her that have the Power. Therefore any breach of the Oath is disloyalty, or treachery, and any power that is used in breach of the Oath is not, and cannot be said to be done in the name of HM the Queen, or by Crown authority. I welcome comments or likes to provide support for this my belief and point of view.

  3. Pingback: SS STEALING BABY: video likely to upset and convince anybody who could never imagine that this is happening UK-wide | Punishment without Crime

  4. Pingback: WHEN DOES a CRUEL and VIOLENT Baby Snatching video become a ‘triumph’? | Victims Unite!

  5. Pingback: Because They Can | JUDICIAL DESTRUCTION OF DOROTHY WILSON

  6. Pingback: September 23, 2012 another mothers heartache submitted via | 12345machar

  7. Dana says:

    Hi Sabine,
    Please take a look at the u tube video about child protection in Baltimore US. It echo’s the UK system! The Director of Social Services Baltimore Molly McGrath Tierney speaks out about this money making industry’s failures to the children in their care! She believes children are better off with their families! Just Google her name.

    • Yes, I learned in Brussels that the US-UK model is to be rolled out all over the world.

      Netherlands was proud to have copied the UK.

      Lithuania is doing it already.

      That’s what happens when PAEDOPHILES RULE the WORLD!!!

  8. Pingback: SCREAMING CHILDREN (from age 10) will be heard promises Family Justice Minister Simon Hughes MP | No Punishment without Crime or Bereavement without Death!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s