FORCED ADOPTION in SECRET COURTS: Will MEPs Help where MPs Fear to Tread?

60 th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration...

This is a letter composed and published by Child Care Proceedings Exposed. You can use WriteToThem to send it to your MEP and mention our petition to the EU Parliament.

The issues are:

  1. Social Services act beyond powers of Police
  2. Hospitals collude with Social Services
  3. Denial of Fair Trial
  4. Social Services should keep Families Together
  5. In the best interest of the child?
  6. Gagging parents to prevent them from speaking out
  7. Article 8: right to private and family life
  8. Secret family courts
  9. Article 7: equality before the law

It has recently come to my attention, that healthy babies are being removed from loving parents on very flimsy evidence and at best conjecture. These children are then fast tracked through the secret family courts for adoption aided and abetted by social workers, guardians, expert witnesses, solicitors and barristers.

If criminal charges are not pursued by police due to lack of evidence, how can social services claim significant harm has taken place?

Most of the cases where social services alleged a child has suffered significant harm are never pursued by the police, because there is not enough evidence to charge and obtain a successful prosecution.

Why would parents take children to A & E departments and GP surgeries, if they had injured their child?

Loving and concerned parents unwittingly take their children to an A & E department and/or GP only to find themselves accused on non accidental injury and subject to care orders and court proceedings.

Why don’t paediatricians make every effort to rule out non accidental injury?

Paediatricians do not make any attempt to rule out non accidental injury. They do not carry out a detailed assessment of the mother and child’s birth or physical history to establish an underlying medical condition. Instead they simply rule in non accidental injury as the only explanation.

How then can parents be put before a family court accused of significant harm?

If a parent is accused of significant harm, then surely they should be charged and put before of court of law and a jury of their peers, where reasonable doubt is the benchmark? Cases in family courts would not stand up in a court of law due to lack of evidence. Any burglar facing a prison sentence of 6 months or more can demand a hearing before a jury, how can it be right or just that parents who risk losing their children for life are denied this option?

Why are parents denied the opportunity to submit independent expert evidence?

What is more concerning is when parents make attempts to try and clear their name, they are deemed to be a bigger risk because they do not accept the courts findings. Why would any innocent parent accept a court’s findings, if they have not caused any harm to their child? If you attempt to instruct independent medical experts for a 2nd opinion or seek an independent X-ray, you are accused of child abuse. There could be no more case of abuse than parting a child from a loving parent.

Why are parents who have been accused of harm denied the right to be trialled by judge and jury?

In family courts, they work on the basis of probability and only 51% that a parent hurt their child. The evidence against them is always biased and in favour of the admitting hospital. They then instruct expert witnesses who always confirm the hospital’s findings.

Hospitals never make any attempt to disprove non-accidental injury and rule it out, instead they simply rule it in as the only probable cause.

Why are social services not making all efforts to keep families together?

Social services are meant to make every attempt to keep a baby with the parent or at worst within the family. This does not seem to be happening. Social services go to great lengths of making a case to have the child removed and placed outside of the family. How can this be in the interest of any child?

How can removing a child from loving parents and given to strangers be in the best interest of a child?

Children are routinely removed from their loving parents and limited to minimal contact in order to break the bond between parent and child. This leaves both parent and child traumatised and in a state of shock and paralysis which renders them hopeless and helpless. Parents and children end up in a worse state than before proceedings started.

Why are parents gagged from speaking out in public?

Parents are put through a torturous time during the proceedings and suffer great distress and trauma. The effects are far reaching. Parents are warned not to go public or they will be gagged or worst still, imprisoned. If you want to be able to clear your name, why wouldn’t you go public?

Where is the right to respect for private and family life?

Article 8: Right to Respect for Private and Family Life
1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. This should be the guiding principle in all cases.

Why are family courts in the UK allowed to hold hearings in secret?

Family courts are held in secret, with no reporting allowed. How can fairness be assured when they are not transparent and open to scrutiny from the outside? Family courts should be open and subject to rigorous scrutiny to ensure that parents accused receive the opportunity to exonerate themselves.

Where is the equality before the law?

Article 7 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that “All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law.” It seems that family courts are no longer working to uphold equality before the law, and are simply ignoring this point.

Advertisements

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is www.smartknowledge.space
This entry was posted in #childsnatchbritain, #childsnatchuk, Abolition of Forced Adoption, Family Court Reform, Internet media, No Punishment without Crime, Protest and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to FORCED ADOPTION in SECRET COURTS: Will MEPs Help where MPs Fear to Tread?

  1. karen bailey says:

    why is it after a mother gives birth to her child due to a child birth related illness an increase in hormone levels and nos she is not well gets the help she needs gos into hospital and moved on to a mother and baby unit to bond with her child has one to one care plan then socail services get police protection order go in and steal her baby with out any explanation then has a court battle on her hands to get her child back who then gets put up for forced adoption this is a mother who loves her child and these people come along and fabricate so many lies and then this mother who is broken hearted and not well is put befor the family law courts has to attend contacts to see her own child who has never been hurt or harmed in any way what so ever only loved and then with the courts say so has to have all kinds of assesments by phycoligist phycitrist cafcass with no support whats so ever with no regards for the mother being ill and distrort then gagged and told not to go to any media what so ever or she could face jail for what becoming a mum for the first time getting an illness that no one could of predicted she never asked for it as it was nature taking its course and loving her child this is british law were is there any justice to this mum and loving family that have been torn apart by the system the mum became ill two weeks after the birth the child was stolen at six weeks after birth and was well and trulely on the mend eight weeks after the birth social services are ment to help keep familys together with support yet this did not happen no support at all there to intrested in reaching adoption targets yet in the uk there are 4000 children waiting to be adopted someone has to see this system is a farce and criminal

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s