Mother Whose Baby Was Removed At Birth But Fought To Get Him Back Speaks Out

Researching Reform

A mother whose baby was removed from her shortly after giving birth, and eventually managed to get him back, will be speaking to journalist Victoria Derbyshire tomorrow about her ordeal.

The interview will be looking at a concept called ‘risk of future harm’, also sometimes described as ‘a child being likely to suffer significant harm’, which is a test or threshold used by social services to remove children from parents who they feel may not be able to parent adequately or who pose a threat to their child in some way.

Although there is currently no set definition for what future harm is exactly,  S.31 of the Children Act 1989 sets out the legal basis or the ‘threshold criteria’ on which a Family Court can make a Care or Supervision Order in respect of a particular child and includes the sentiment that a child must be “suffering, or likely to suffer, significant harm”. ‘Significant Harm’

View original post 59 more words


About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s